What's this?

commandlinefu.com is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again.

Delete that bloated snippets file you've been using and share your personal repository with the world. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.

Get involved!

You can sign-in using OpenID credentials, or register a traditional username and password.

First-time OpenID users will be automatically assigned a username which can be changed after signing in.

Universal configuration monitoring and system of record for IT.

Stay in the loop…

Follow the Tweets.

Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.

» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu3
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu10

Subscribe to the feeds.

Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):

Subscribe to the feed for:



May 19, 2015 - A Look At The New Commandlinefu
I've put together a short writeup on what kind of newness you can expect from the next iteration of clfu. Check it out here.
March 2, 2015 - New Management
I'm Jon, I'll be maintaining and improving clfu. Thanks to David for building such a great resource!

Top Tags



Psst. Open beta.

Wow, didn't really expect you to read this far down. The latest iteration of the site is in open beta. It's a gentle open beta-- not in prime-time just yet. It's being hosted over at UpGuard (link) and you are more than welcome to give it a shot. Couple things:

  • » The open beta is running a copy of the database that will not carry over to the final version. Don't post anything you don't mind losing.
  • » If you wish to use your user account, you will probably need to reset your password.
Your feedback is appreciated via the form on the beta page. Thanks! -Jon & CLFU Team

List the size (in human readable form) of all sub folders from the current location

Terminal - List the size (in human readable form) of all sub folders from the current location
du -h --max-depth=1
2009-02-05 14:37:24
User: PeekNPoke
Functions: du
List the size (in human readable form) of all sub folders from the current location


There are 3 alternatives - vote for the best!

Terminal - Alternatives
sudo du -ks $(ls -d */) | sort -nr | cut -f2 | xargs -d '\n' du -sh 2> /dev/null
2009-08-17 22:21:09
User: Code_Bleu
Functions: cut du ls sort sudo xargs
Tags: disk usage

This allows the output to be sorted from largest to smallest in human readable format.

du -sh */
du -sch ./*
du -a --max-depth=1 | sort -n
du --max-depth=1|sort -n|cut -f2|tr '\n' '\0'|xargs -0 du -sh 2>/dev/null

Know a better way?

If you can do better, submit your command here.

What others think

See also dutop:


Comment by pixelbeat 402 weeks and 5 days ago

I actually use this command as an alias to simply "d" all the time. So helpful!

Comment by volve 402 weeks and 5 days ago

slightly different version: sizes of subfolders and files in the current folder

du -sh *
Comment by chickenkiller 402 weeks and 4 days ago

i was just about to post chickenkiller's method too

Comment by jlin64 400 weeks and 4 days ago

The difference between chicknkiller's method and PeekNPoke's method, is PeekNPoke's recurses hidden files and directories, while chickenkiller's does not.

Comment by atoponce 399 weeks and 1 day ago

I use this a lot when I'm tracing down to free up space

du -sh */

same as chickenkiller but only show directories

Comment by asmoore82 398 weeks and 1 day ago

On BSD you'd use

du -hd1
Comment by lme 396 weeks and 4 days ago

curses based: http://dev.yorhel.nl/ncdu/

Comment by Hollow 394 weeks ago

Yes, this is very good one. I was always using

du -s *

but that, apparently is missing .* files

And I'm usually adding sort to du, to get better picture:

du -h --max-depth=1 | sort -n

Comment by vleolml 389 weeks ago

You can't sort numbers followed by M K B try

du --max-depth=1 | sort -nr

n : sort by numbers

r : show big ones on the top :P

Comment by funyotros 364 weeks ago

My du doesn't have a --maxdepth option.

Comment by putnamhill 358 weeks and 4 days ago

>>> You can't sort numbers followed by M K B try

But we can sort by this command:

du -h --max-depth=1 | sort -hr

-h: --human-numeric-sort compare human readable numbers (e.g., 2K 1G)

Comment by brun65i 312 weeks and 5 days ago

Now --max-depth has the short form -d, so --max-depth=N is the same as -d N

Comment by alfplayer 295 weeks and 2 days ago

Your point of view

You must be signed in to comment.