Hide

What's this?

commandlinefu.com is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again.

Delete that bloated snippets file you've been using and share your personal repository with the world. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.


If you have a new feature suggestion or find a bug, please get in touch via http://commandlinefu.uservoice.com/

Get involved!

You can sign-in using OpenID credentials, or register a traditional username and password.

First-time OpenID users will be automatically assigned a username which can be changed after signing in.

Hide

Stay in the loop…

Follow the Tweets.

Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.

» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu3
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu10

Subscribe to the feeds.

Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):

Subscribe to the feed for:

Hide

News

2011-03-12 - Confoo 2011 presentation
Slides are available from the commandlinefu presentation at Confoo 2011: http://presentations.codeinthehole.com/confoo2011/
2011-01-04 - Moderation now required for new commands
To try and put and end to the spamming, new commands require moderation before they will appear on the site.
2010-12-27 - Apologies for not banning the trolls sooner
Have been away from the interwebs over Christmas. Will be more vigilant henceforth.
2010-09-24 - OAuth and pagination problems fixed
Apologies for the delay in getting Twitter's OAuth supported. Annoying pagination gremlin also fixed.
Hide

Tags

Hide

Functions

List the size (in human readable form) of all sub folders from the current location

Terminal - List the size (in human readable form) of all sub folders from the current location
du -h --max-depth=1
2009-02-05 14:37:24
User: PeekNPoke
Functions: du
132
List the size (in human readable form) of all sub folders from the current location

Alternatives

There are 3 alternatives - vote for the best!

Terminal - Alternatives
sudo du -ks $(ls -d */) | sort -nr | cut -f2 | xargs -d '\n' du -sh 2> /dev/null
2009-08-17 22:21:09
User: Code_Bleu
Functions: cut du ls sort sudo xargs
Tags: disk usage
7

This allows the output to be sorted from largest to smallest in human readable format.

du -sh */
du -sch ./*
du -a --max-depth=1 | sort -n
du --max-depth=1|sort -n|cut -f2|tr '\n' '\0'|xargs -0 du -sh 2>/dev/null

Know a better way?

If you can do better, submit your command here.

What others think

See also dutop:

http://www.pixelbeat.org/scripts/dutop

Comment by pixelbeat 306 weeks and 4 days ago

I actually use this command as an alias to simply "d" all the time. So helpful!

Comment by volve 306 weeks and 4 days ago

slightly different version: sizes of subfolders and files in the current folder

du -sh *
Comment by chickenkiller 306 weeks and 3 days ago

i was just about to post chickenkiller's method too

Comment by jlin64 304 weeks and 3 days ago

The difference between chicknkiller's method and PeekNPoke's method, is PeekNPoke's recurses hidden files and directories, while chickenkiller's does not.

Comment by atoponce 303 weeks ago

I use this a lot when I'm tracing down to free up space

du -sh */

same as chickenkiller but only show directories

Comment by asmoore82 302 weeks ago

On BSD you'd use

du -hd1
Comment by lme 300 weeks and 3 days ago

curses based: http://dev.yorhel.nl/ncdu/

Comment by Hollow 297 weeks and 6 days ago

Yes, this is very good one. I was always using

du -s *

but that, apparently is missing .* files

And I'm usually adding sort to du, to get better picture:

du -h --max-depth=1 | sort -n

Comment by vleolml 293 weeks ago

You can't sort numbers followed by M K B try

du --max-depth=1 | sort -nr

n : sort by numbers

r : show big ones on the top :P

Comment by funyotros 267 weeks and 6 days ago

My du doesn't have a --maxdepth option.

Comment by putnamhill 262 weeks and 3 days ago

>>> You can't sort numbers followed by M K B try

But we can sort by this command:

du -h --max-depth=1 | sort -hr

-h: --human-numeric-sort compare human readable numbers (e.g., 2K 1G)

Comment by brun65i 216 weeks and 4 days ago

Now --max-depth has the short form -d, so --max-depth=N is the same as -d N

Comment by alfplayer 199 weeks and 2 days ago

Your point of view

You must be signed in to comment.

Related sites and podcasts