commandlinefu.com is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again.
Delete that bloated snippets file you've been using and share your personal repository with the world. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.
If you have a new feature suggestion or find a bug, please get in touch via http://commandlinefu.uservoice.com/
You can sign-in using OpenID credentials, or register a traditional username and password.
First-time OpenID users will be automatically assigned a username which can be changed after signing in.
Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu3
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu10
Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):
Subscribe to the feed for:
the tee command does fine with file names, but not so much with file descriptors, such as &2 (stderr). This uses process redirection to tee to the specified descriptor.
In the sample output, it's being used to tee to stderr, which is connected with the terminal, and to wc -l, which is also outputting to the terminal. The result is the output of bash --version followed by the linecount
There is 1 alternative - vote for the best!
Tee can be used to split a pipe into multiple streams for one or more process to work it. You can add more " >()" for even more fun.
If you can do better, submit your command here.
You must be signed in to comment.
This screams of a bash high-level usage of dup2(). I love it. This means I can "redirect" stdout to both stdout and stderr. But wouldn't
tee /dev/stderrdo the same thing, in a way that's a little more portable?
Thanks kaedenn. I don't know wether it's more portable, but it is shorter and easier to read/memorize.
I think you're right there kaedenn, but then you're limited to the three regular ones that are duplicated in /dev, whereas the >(...) is resolved to a numerically named file in the /dev/fd directory, which gives you a few more options.
More reading here: http://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/bashref.html#Redirections
Also, if you want to do some further processing, you sort of need to use the process substitution method anyways. For example:
echo "foo" |tee >(sed 's/.*/& 2/' >&2)| sed 's/.*/& 1/'should output a 2 next to the stderr copy, and a 1 next to the stdout copy. I'm not sure how you would do that using a write only file like /dev/stderr