Hide

What's this?

commandlinefu.com is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again.

Delete that bloated snippets file you've been using and share your personal repository with the world. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.


If you have a new feature suggestion or find a bug, please get in touch via http://commandlinefu.uservoice.com/

Get involved!

You can sign-in using OpenID credentials, or register a traditional username and password.

First-time OpenID users will be automatically assigned a username which can be changed after signing in.

Universal configuration monitoring and system of record for IT.
Hide

Stay in the loop…

Follow the Tweets.

Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.

» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu3
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu10

Subscribe to the feeds.

Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):

Subscribe to the feed for:

Hide

News

May 19, 2015 - A Look At The New Commandlinefu
I've put together a short writeup on what kind of newness you can expect from the next iteration of clfu. Check it out here.
March 2, 2015 - New Management
I'm Jon, I'll be maintaining and improving clfu. Thanks to David for building such a great resource!
Hide

Top Tags

Hide

Functions

Hide

Credits

Display a random man page

Terminal - Display a random man page
man $(ls /bin | shuf | head -1)
2010-08-20 23:12:51
Functions: head ls man
1
Display a random man page

I'm not sure why you would want to do this, but this seems a lot simpler (easier to understand) than the version someone submitted using awk.

Alternatives

There are 2 alternatives - vote for the best!

Terminal - Alternatives
dir="/bin"; man $(ls $dir |sed -n "$(echo $(( $RANDOM % $(ls $dir |wc -l | awk "{ print $1; }" ) + 1 )) )p")
2010-08-20 16:31:50
User: camocrazed
Functions: dir ls man sed
Tags: man sed awk echo wc
-2

Broaden your knowledge of the utilities available to you in no particular order whatsoever! Then use that knowledge to create more nifty one-liners that you can post here. =p

Takes a random number modulo the number of files in $dir, prints the filename corresponding to that number, and passes it as an argument to man.

man $(ls /bin | sed -n $((RANDOM % $(ls /bin | wc -l) + 1))p)
2010-08-20 17:15:33
User: putnamhill
Functions: ls man sed wc
Tags: man sed ls wc random
-2

Great idea camocrazed. Another twist would be to display a different man page based on the day of the year. The following will continuously cycle through all man pages:

man $(ls /bin | sed -n $(($(date +%j) % $(ls /bin | wc -l)))p)
(cd /bin; set -- *; x=$((1+($RANDOM % $#))); man ${!x})
man $(ls -1 /usr/share/man/man?/ | shuf -n1 | cut -d. -f1)
2010-08-20 23:36:10
User: dooblem
Functions: cut ls man
Tags: man sort shuf
-3

Another one.

Maybe not the quicker because of the sort command, but it will also look in other man sections.

updated with goodevilgenius 'shuf' idea

man $(/bin/ls /bin | awk '{ cmd[i++] = $0 } END { srand(); print cmd[int(rand()*length(cmd))]; }')
2010-08-20 17:31:02
User: emilsit
Functions: awk man
Tags: man awk
-4

Build an awk array with all commands and then select a random one at the end.

This avoids spawning extra processes for counting with wc or generating random numbers.

Explicitly call /bin/ls to avoid interactions with aliases.

Know a better way?

If you can do better, submit your command here.

What others think

Although this command is short and neat, it would not scale well to a directory containing many file names. Shuffling, say, 20000 file names, would be much more onerous than merely choosing a random number between 1 and 20000.

Comment by quintic 254 weeks and 3 days ago

Your point of view

You must be signed in to comment.