Hide

What's this?

commandlinefu.com is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again.

Delete that bloated snippets file you've been using and share your personal repository with the world. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.


If you have a new feature suggestion or find a bug, please get in touch via http://commandlinefu.uservoice.com/

Get involved!

You can sign-in using OpenID credentials, or register a traditional username and password.

First-time OpenID users will be automatically assigned a username which can be changed after signing in.

Hide

Stay in the loop…

Follow the Tweets.

Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.

» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu3
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu10

Subscribe to the feeds.

Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):

Subscribe to the feed for:

Hide

News

2011-03-12 - Confoo 2011 presentation
Slides are available from the commandlinefu presentation at Confoo 2011: http://presentations.codeinthehole.com/confoo2011/
2011-01-04 - Moderation now required for new commands
To try and put and end to the spamming, new commands require moderation before they will appear on the site.
2010-12-27 - Apologies for not banning the trolls sooner
Have been away from the interwebs over Christmas. Will be more vigilant henceforth.
2010-09-24 - OAuth and pagination problems fixed
Apologies for the delay in getting Twitter's OAuth supported. Annoying pagination gremlin also fixed.
Hide

Tags

Hide

Functions

Find out current working directory of a process

Terminal - Find out current working directory of a process
readlink /proc/self/cwd
2011-04-14 23:14:28
User: linuts
Functions: readlink
2
Find out current working directory of a process

Alternatives

There is 1 alternative - vote for the best!

Terminal - Alternatives
echo "${0%/*}"
2011-04-17 12:09:56
User: mhs
Functions: echo
10

Invoked from within a shell script, this will print the directory in which the script resides. Doesn't depend on external tools, /proc/self/*, etc.. (`echo` is a shell builtin.) To see the *current working* directory of a script, use `pwd`.

eval ls -l /proc/{$(pgrep -d, COMMAND)}/cwd
2011-04-14 13:41:58
User: splante
Functions: eval ls
3

This is an alternative to another command using two xargs. If it's a command you know there's only one of, you can just use:

ls -l /proc/$(pgrep COMMAND)/cwd
echo COMMAND | xargs -ixxx ps -C xxx -o pid= | xargs -ixxx ls -l /proc/xxx/cwd
mydir=$(cd $(dirname ${BASH_SOURCE:-$0});pwd)
2011-04-27 16:33:38
User: xeor
Functions: cd dirname
Tags: cd script pwd
0

I submitted a command like this without $0 if $BASH_SOURCE is unset. Therefor, it did only work when using ./script, not using 'sh script'. This version handles both, and will set $mydir in a script to the current working directory. It also works on linux, osx and probably bsd.

pwdx $(pgrep command)
2013-02-01 08:33:15
User: weidenrinde
0

The pwdx command reports the current working directory of a process or processes.

Know a better way?

If you can do better, submit your command here.

What others think

Unless the path is a link, readlink doesn't echo the path by default. It needs either '-e' or '-m' to echo whether or not the path is to a link.

Comment by eikenberry 188 weeks and 2 days ago

/proc/self/cwd is always a symlink (man proc)

Comment by linuts 188 weeks and 2 days ago

This is not really an "alternative" to some of the others, as this is the current working directory of the *current* process. A couple of the earlier alternatives are for finding the working directory of some other command, such as the apache executable or the currently running vim commands.

Your version is almost the same as the much simpler $PWD (or pwd command), except yours returns the canonical version of the directory which is handy. You could accomplish the same with

readlink -f $PWD

but that's not really easier.

Comment by splante 188 weeks and 2 days ago

Your point of view

You must be signed in to comment.

Related sites and podcasts