Any thoughts on this command? Does it work on your machine? Can you do the same thing with only 14 characters?
You must be signed in to comment.
commandlinefu.com is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.
Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu3
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu10
Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):
Subscribe to the feed for:
find . -type f -exec cat {} \; | wc -lusing xargs makes the command complete in 1 second:find . -type f | xargs cat | wc -lAnytime you find yourself using a loop with find, there's a possibility that xargs could be helpful and a lot faster.find . -type f | xargs wc -lfind . -type f -exec cat {} + | wc -lYou see, if you use the \;, that would be the same as doing(cat file1; cat file2; cat file3 ... ) | wc -lbut with the +, it's the same as doingcat file1 file2 file3 ... | wc -lThat gets more to the real point of cat (concatenate, not print).