Erase empty files

find . -size 0 -exec rm '{}' \;

0
By: xrm0
2009-10-29 14:59:44

1 Alternatives + Submit Alt

What Others Think

For your safety: find . -type f -size 0 -exec rm '{}' \;
pvrmza · 451 weeks and 3 days ago
how about: `find . -type f -size 0 -delete`
alesplin · 451 weeks and 3 days ago
using -delete will be way faster. With the -exec {} \; option find must spawn one rm process per file to delete, this is a waste of resources and could proceed much faster if you use -delete or -exec {} +, which behaves the same as osvaldofilho's xargs method. With many files the improvement is big.
bwoodacre · 451 weeks and 3 days ago
is there a difference between ... -exec rm {} \; and ... -exec rm '{}' \; ? what is the benefit of single quotes?
alperyilmaz · 451 weeks and 1 day ago

What do you think?

Any thoughts on this command? Does it work on your machine? Can you do the same thing with only 14 characters?

You must be signed in to comment.

What's this?

commandlinefu.com is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.

Share Your Commands



Stay in the loop…

Follow the Tweets.

Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.

» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu3
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu10

Subscribe to the feeds.

Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):

Subscribe to the feed for: