Robust expansion (i.e. crash) of bash variables with a typo

set -eu
By default bash expands an unbound variable to an empty string. This can be dangerous, if a critical variable name (a path prefix for example) has a typo. The -u option causes bash to treat this as an error, and the -e option causes it to exit in case of an error. These two together will make your scripts a lot safer against typos. The default behaviour can be explicitly requested using the ${NAME:-} syntax. A (less explicit) variation: #!/bin/bash -eu
Sample Output
$ cat 

set -eu
# a dangerous-looking typo, is /bin going to disappear:
rm -rf "$CACHEDI/bin"

$ ./ 
./ line 7: CACHEDI: unbound variable

By: wipu
2010-04-07 11:54:40

What Others Think

The -e and -u options are POSIX standard, so they should work with any /bin/sh, not just bash.
inof · 632 weeks and 1 day ago
Btw, you need to be careful with commands like grep and find that exit with nonzero when they don't find anything. To make matters worse, failures like these are completely silent. These kinds of commands need to be "guarded" by e.g. adding '|| echo "Nothing found"' or something after them. IMHO this kind of problem is less dangerous and easier to solve than the problems caused by not using set -eu, though.
wipu · 554 weeks and 3 days ago
Have you ever encountered a problem that seemed out of your control? And how do you deal with them? Have you really focused on entertainment? Or do you just take a break from work and still think about it? Impossible Game will be the solution to help you forget everything to have a time of real entertainment, and also a way for you to know where your limits are!
KevinDurant · 23 weeks and 1 day ago ????? ??? ????? ????? SEO - ????? ???? ????? ????? ????? ??? ????? ????? SEO - ????? ???? ????? ????? ????? ??? ????? ????? SEO - ????? ???? ????? ????? ????? ??? ????? ????? SEO - ????? ???? ????? ????? ????? ??? ????? ????? SEO - ????? ???? ????? ????? ????? ??? ????? ????? SEO - ????? ???? ????? ????? ????? ??? ????? ???? SEO ????? ????? ????? ???? ????? ????? ??? ???? ???? ??????? Search Engine Optimization ??? ????? ??????????? ?? ????? ?????????? ????? ????? ?? ???? ???SEO
seofox · 15 weeks and 2 days ago
seofox · 14 weeks and 3 days ago

What do you think?

Any thoughts on this command? Does it work on your machine? Can you do the same thing with only 14 characters?

You must be signed in to comment.

What's this? is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.

Share Your Commands

Stay in the loop…

Follow the Tweets.

Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.


Subscribe to the feeds.

Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):

Subscribe to the feed for: