du with colored bar graph

t=$(df|awk 'NR!=1{sum+=$2}END{print sum}');sudo du / --max-depth=1|sed '$d'|sort -rn -k1 | awk -v t=$t 'OFMT="%d" {M=64; for (a=0;a<$1;a++){if (a>c){c=a}}br=a/c;b=M*br;for(x=0;x<b;x++){printf "\033[1;31m" "|" "\033[0m"}print " "$2" "(a/t*100)"% total"}'
i'm using gawk, you may get varying mileage with other varieties. You might want to change the / after du to say, /home/ or /var or something, otherwise this command might take quite some time to complete. Sorry it's so obsfucated, I had to turn a script into a one-liner under 255 characters for commandlinefu. Note: the bar ratio is relative, so the highest ratio of the total disk, "anchors" the rest of the graph. EDIT: the math was slightly wrong, fixed it. Also, made it compliant with older versions of df.
Sample Output
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| /usr 5.71248% total
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| /var 3.19542% total
||||||||||||||||| /home 1.49544% total
||||||||| /lib 0.75594% total
|| /boot 0.154587% total


13
2011-12-01 01:21:11

1 Alternatives + Submit Alt

  • A more efficient way, with reversed order to put the focus in the big ones. Show Sample Output


    11
    du -x --max-depth=1|sort -rn|awk -F / -v c=$COLUMNS 'NR==1{t=$1} NR>1{r=int($1/t*c+.5); b="\033[1;31m"; for (i=0; i<r; i++) b=b"#"; printf " %5.2f%% %s\033[0m %s\n", $1/t*100, b, $2}'|tac
    point_to_null · 2015-09-12 10:36:49 8

What Others Think

Getting this error. du: warning: summarising conflicts with --max-depth=1
MrMuddle · 341 weeks and 6 days ago
Not sure why that would happen. According to the du source code, that should only happen: if (opt_summarize_only && max_depth_specified && max_depth != 0) and unless you added a max-depth=0, or -s, i'm not sure why it would give you that error. I'm curios, what version of du are you running, and what OS ?
kevinquinnyo · 341 weeks and 6 days ago
Ubuntu 10.10 x64 du (GNU coreutils) 8.5 Cheers
MrMuddle · 341 weeks and 6 days ago
what happens when you run: sudo du / --max-depth=1|sort -rn -k1
kevinquinnyo · 341 weeks and 6 days ago
Same thing bud :|
MrMuddle · 341 weeks and 6 days ago
Got it right! Thanks
unixmonkey14651 · 341 weeks and 6 days ago
"for (a=0;ac){c=a}}" this loop is completely useless (and also responsable of the slowness of your command since a can be very large) substitute it with a=$1; if (a>c){c=a}
BrokenDroid · 340 weeks and 5 days ago
Yeah; that loop (and the rest of the structure) is kinda you dont know about awk. Why are you even using du, a second instance of awk and not using $COLUMNS value?
point_to_null · 144 weeks and 3 days ago
Sorry. I mean to say "why are you even using sed". And also; thanks by sharing. When using AWK try to put all the logic inside. It's a very powerful language.
point_to_null · 144 weeks and 3 days ago

What do you think?

Any thoughts on this command? Does it work on your machine? Can you do the same thing with only 14 characters?

You must be signed in to comment.

What's this?

commandlinefu.com is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.

Share Your Commands



Stay in the loop…

Follow the Tweets.

Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.

» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu3
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu10

Subscribe to the feeds.

Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):

Subscribe to the feed for: