commandlinefu.com is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again.
Delete that bloated snippets file you've been using and share your personal repository with the world. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.
If you have a new feature suggestion or find a bug, please get in touch via http://commandlinefu.uservoice.com/
You can sign-in using OpenID credentials, or register a traditional username and password.
First-time OpenID users will be automatically assigned a username which can be changed after signing in.
Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu3
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu10
Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):
Subscribe to the feed for:
There is 1 alternative - vote for the best!
If you can do better, submit your command here.
You must be signed in to comment.
you may be interested in this command:
http://www.commandlinefu.com/commands/view/1560/set-cdpath-to-ease-navigation
I think it will better accomplish what you're trying to do here.
Better, use a function (in bash at least) once and for all:
# up () { for count in `seq 1 \$*`; do cd ..; done; }
up = up 1
upp = up 2
uppp = up 3
Is this really necessary? I can't say that typing "cd ../../.." has ever been particularly hard, and any time it would get monotonous is a job for a script anyway.
Firstly the command in unnecessarily complicated, it can be written
alias up='cd ..' upp='cd ../..' uppp='cd ../../..' upppp='cd ../../../..' uppppp='cd ../../../../..'Secondly let me suggest a slightly improved version of pruneau's function definition
..() { for i in $(seq 1 $*); do cd ..; done; }The advantage of using ".. [n]" is that it includes
alias ..='cd ..'