commandlinefu.com is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again.
Delete that bloated snippets file you've been using and share your personal repository with the world. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.
If you have a new feature suggestion or find a bug, please get in touch via http://commandlinefu.uservoice.com/
You can sign-in using OpenID credentials, or register a traditional username and password.
First-time OpenID users will be automatically assigned a username which can be changed after signing in.
Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu3
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu10
Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):
Subscribe to the feed for:
It will return a ranked list of your most commonly-entered commands using your command history
If you can do better, submit your command here.
You must be signed in to comment.
Already posted in a shorter version
http://www.commandlinefu.com/commands/view/869/list-of-commands-you-use-most-often
@TheMightyBuzzard: I tested both commands under OS X and found kayowas' version more accurate: It correctly handles command such as:
ls|grep "foo"where the pipe symbol immediately follows the command.
I bet "cd" and "ls" will be the top commands in most of our readers lists ;)
I think awk '{print $1}' approach is not accurate for counting commands in pipes. So, I propose the following(*) for the most accurate counting:
....|perl -F'\|' -ane 'foreach $pipe (@F) {$pipe=~ /\s*(\w+?)\s/;print $1,"\n";} ' | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr | headBelow is comparison of top 10 commands
My method kayowas' method
1023 sudo 1003 sudo
970 perl 894 cd
904 cd 657 nano
668 nano 617 perl
624 awk 593 ls
601 ls 498 cat
601 grep 351 history
569 cat 293 man
499 cut 284 head
457 head 276 find
(*) print history without the line numbers
sorry, spaces and tabs are lost, i'm posting the results again:
My method ----- kayowas' method
1023 sudo --- 1003 sudo
970 perl ----- 894 cd
904 cd ------- 657 nano
668 nano ----- 617 perl
624 awk ------ 593 ls
601 ls ------- 498 cat
601 grep ----- 351 history
569 cat ------ 293 man
499 cut ------ 284 head
457 head ----- 276 find
Notice absence of awk, cut and grep in kayowas' method.