commandlinefu.com is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again.
Delete that bloated snippets file you've been using and share your personal repository with the world. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.
If you have a new feature suggestion or find a bug, please get in touch via http://commandlinefu.uservoice.com/
You can sign-in using OpenID credentials, or register a traditional username and password.
First-time OpenID users will be automatically assigned a username which can be changed after signing in.
Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu3
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu10
Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):
Subscribe to the feed for:
This will download all the phracks! Enjoy!
There are 6 alternatives - vote for the best!
If you can do better, submit your command here.
You must be signed in to comment.
wget -r -A "phrack*.tar.gz" http://www.phrack.org/archives/tgz/Seems as if nobody tested the commands. There is no phrack67.tar.gz.
Besides that none of the solutions is what I'd call fast; the curl one took 1 minute 14.35 seconds on my system.
aria2c is much faster. I used the somewhat evil and ugly aria2 call
aria2c -D -P -Z -s 5 -j 45 --file-allocation=none --enable-http-keep-alive=true --enable-http-pipelining=true http://www.phrack.org/archives/tgz/phrack[1-66].tar.gzto perform the download in 29.02 seconds.
"Seems as if nobody tested the commands. There is no phrack67.tar.gz."
Look at the range again in my loop: (I actually did test this and it works fine, but I do like petrohs solution better, no offense.)
for ((i=1; i
{i} Will never be set to 67 because ${i} has to be less than 67.