commandlinefu.com is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again.
Delete that bloated snippets file you've been using and share your personal repository with the world. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.
If you have a new feature suggestion or find a bug, please get in touch via http://commandlinefu.uservoice.com/
You can sign-in using OpenID credentials, or register a traditional username and password.
First-time OpenID users will be automatically assigned a username which can be changed after signing in.
Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu3
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu10
Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):
Subscribe to the feed for:
There are 7 alternatives - vote for the best!
If you can do better, submit your command here.
You must be signed in to comment.
OMG, what's that? What's wrong with
prog1;prog2
or
prog1 && prog2
@zolden,
Suppose prog1 is already running and you need prog2 to start after prog1 exits. However, there is a simpler way to do what the submitter has proposed:
while pkill -0 prog1; do sleep 10; done; prog2@daa, yes you're right. But i 've just found another simpler :
press Ctrl+Z to suspend prog1 then :
fg && prog2Nevertheless if you don't have hand on prog1, it's a good means to wait.
@daa you should submit this :)
@FRUiT, I submitted it two days ago but and I'm still waiting the command to pass through the moderation.
Thank you ^^