mkdir test{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10}
something extremely boring to type! Why not use seq?
seq -s, 1 10
and use its output inside the curly braces?
The obvious solution
mkdir test{$(seq -s, 1 10)}
is, unfortunately, too naive and doesn't work. The answer is the order of the shell expansions (feature of Bourne Shell, actually), where brace expansion happens before command substitution (according to Bash's manual).
The solution is to put another level of substitution, using the powerful and mystic command eval.
I found the trick in a similar problem in the post at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6549037/bash-brace-expansion-in-scripts-not-working-due-to-unwanted-escaping
no need for seq or eval
Any thoughts on this command? Does it work on your machine? Can you do the same thing with only 14 characters?
You must be signed in to comment.
commandlinefu.com is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.
Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu3
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu10
Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):
Subscribe to the feed for:
mkdir test{1..10} works fine
seq -s, 1 4 1000
How, are you going to write it? Or, let's say you're creating the directories "lonely", "closely", "finally" and all these names are stored in a shell variable, or can be extracted from another program. The numbers here are just an example. A simple, and maybe not very suitable, example. They don't really have any special meaning.echo {1..100..4},