Hide

What's this?

commandlinefu.com is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again.

Delete that bloated snippets file you've been using and share your personal repository with the world. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.


If you have a new feature suggestion or find a bug, please get in touch via http://commandlinefu.uservoice.com/

Get involved!

You can sign-in using OpenID credentials, or register a traditional username and password.

First-time OpenID users will be automatically assigned a username which can be changed after signing in.

Hide

Stay in the loop…

Follow the Tweets.

Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.

» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu3
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu10

Subscribe to the feeds.

Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):

Subscribe to the feed for:

Hide

News

2011-03-12 - Confoo 2011 presentation
Slides are available from the commandlinefu presentation at Confoo 2011: http://presentations.codeinthehole.com/confoo2011/
2011-01-04 - Moderation now required for new commands
To try and put and end to the spamming, new commands require moderation before they will appear on the site.
2010-12-27 - Apologies for not banning the trolls sooner
Have been away from the interwebs over Christmas. Will be more vigilant henceforth.
2010-09-24 - OAuth and pagination problems fixed
Apologies for the delay in getting Twitter's OAuth supported. Annoying pagination gremlin also fixed.
Hide

Tags

Hide

Functions

Resize images with mogrify with lots of options

Terminal - Resize images with mogrify with lots of options
find . -name '*.jpg' -o -name '*.JPG' | xargs -I{} mogrify -resize 1024">" -quality 40 {}
2013-06-20 15:20:29
Functions: find xargs
-2
Resize images with mogrify with lots of options

First use find to find all the images that end with jpg or JPG in the current dir and all its children.

Then pipe that to xargs. The -I{} makes it so spaces in filenames don't matter.

The 1024">" makes it so it takes any image greater in dimension than 1024 and resizes them to 1024 width, but keeping aspect ratio on height.

Then it sets the image quality to 40.

Piping it through xargs means you avoid the file count limit, and you could run this on your entire file system if you wanted.

Alternatives

There is 1 alternative - vote for the best!

Terminal - Alternatives
find . -name '*.jpg' -o -name '*.JPG' -print0 | xargs -0 mogrify -resize 1024">" -quality 40
2013-06-20 16:09:41
User: minnmass
Functions: find xargs
0

The "find $stuff -print0 | xargs -0 $command" pattern causes both find and xargs to use null-delineated paths, greatly reducing the probability of either hiccuping on even the weirdest of file/path names.

It's also not strictly necessary to add the {} at the end of the xargs command line, as it'll put the files there automatically.

Mind, in most environments, you could use find's "-exec" option to bypass xargs entirely:

find . -name '*.jpg' -o -name '*.JPG' -exec mogrify -resize 1024">" -quality 40 {} +

will use xargs-like "make sure the command line isn't too long" logic to run the mogrify command as few times as necessary (to run once per file, use a ';' instead of a '+' - just be sure to escape it properly).

find . -name '*.[Jj][Pp][Gg]' -exec mogrify -resize 1024">" -quality 40 {} \;
2013-06-21 13:27:25
User: hugme
Functions: find
0

The find command can do this on it's own. This is a shorter faster version, it also includes more advanced regex (it will find .Jpg etc). Find doesn't need a pipe, you can run it directly from the command.

Know a better way?

If you can do better, submit your command here.

What others think

The option

-iname '*.jpg'

may be used instead of

-name '*.jpg' -o -name '*.JPG'

Comment by SAKDOSS 70 weeks ago

Wonderful.

Share a website with you ,

( http://www.femalemalls.com/ )

Believe you will love it.

We accept any form of payment.

http://www.femalemalls.com/Michael-Kors-Handbags-n2447/

Comment by femalemalls11 69 weeks and 5 days ago

Your point of view

You must be signed in to comment.

Related sites and podcasts