commandlinefu.com is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again.
Delete that bloated snippets file you've been using and share your personal repository with the world. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.
If you have a new feature suggestion or find a bug, please get in touch via http://commandlinefu.uservoice.com/
You can sign-in using OpenID credentials, or register a traditional username and password.
First-time OpenID users will be automatically assigned a username which can be changed after signing in.
Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu3
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu10
Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):
Subscribe to the feed for:
If you want to operate on a set of items in Bash, and at least one of them contains spaces, the `for` loop isn't going to work the way you might expect. For example, if the current dir has two files, named "file" and "file 2", this would loop 3 times (once each for "file", "file", and "2"):
for ITEM in `ls`; do echo "$ITEM"; done
Instead, use a while loop with `read`:
ls | while read ITEM; do echo "$ITEM"; done
There are 2 alternatives - vote for the best!
If you can do better, submit your command here.
You must be signed in to comment.
I think I might prefer:
find . -maxdepth 1 -exec {} \;You don't even have to worry about the quote. "find" takes care of it for you.
However, if I wanted to perform multiple operations on one set of items, I would definitely use this method you suggested.
@fletch: As you said, the following does not work:
for FILE in `ls`; do echo "$FILE"; doneBut the following will work:
for FILE in *; do echo "$FILE"; doneHowever, I also acknowledge that your way works.
Grr why is this being upmodded? Unixmonkey1878's method is the right way to do this. ls is for presenting a directory listing to humans, that's it!
You're all correct, there are other ways to do that particular example. Your methods only work for a list of files though, and the intent was to show a way to iterate over a any list of items that have spaces. `ls` could have been any command.