Hide

What's this?

commandlinefu.com is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again.

Delete that bloated snippets file you've been using and share your personal repository with the world. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.


If you have a new feature suggestion or find a bug, please get in touch via http://commandlinefu.uservoice.com/

Get involved!

You can sign-in using OpenID credentials, or register a traditional username and password.

First-time OpenID users will be automatically assigned a username which can be changed after signing in.

World cup college
Hide

Stay in the loop…

Follow the Tweets.

Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.

» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu3
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu10

Subscribe to the feeds.

Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):

Subscribe to the feed for:

Hide

News

2010-03-18 - Top 10 commands explained
There's a great article by Peteris Krumins explaining the current top 10 commands: http://www.catonmat.net/blog/top-ten-one-liners-from-commandlinefu-explained/
2010-03-03 - Commandlinefu @ SXSW 2010
Am going to be at SXSW this year, in case you want to submit any CLI nuggets or suggestions to me in person. Ping me on the @codeinthehole Twitter account.
2009-09-12 - Email updates now available
You can now enable email updates to let you know each time you're command is commented on.
2009-07-11 - API and javascript blog widget now available
A simple API has been released, allowing commands to be retrieved in various formats. This also allows commands to be embedded on blogs/homepages.
Hide

Tags

Hide

Functions

count how many times a string appears in a (source code) tree

Terminal - count how many times a string appears in a (source code) tree
grep -rc logged_in app/ | cut -d : -f 2 | awk '{sum+=$1} END {print sum}'
2009-07-15 14:16:44
User: terceiro
Functions: awk cut grep
-2
count how many times a string appears in a (source code) tree

grep's -c outputs how may matches there are for a given file as "file:N", cut takes the N's and awk does the sum.

Alternatives

There is 1 alternative - vote for the best!

Terminal - Alternatives
$ grep -or string path/ | wc -l
2009-07-16 12:50:59
User: ioggstream
Functions: grep wc
7

grep -o puts each occurrence in a separate line

Know a better way?

If you can do better, submit your command here.

What others think

if you leave out the -c option of grep then you can get wc to do the counting for you:

grep -r PATTERN app/ | wc -l

because then grep returns one match per line.

Comment by bwoodacre 60 weeks and 1 day ago

Strictly speaking this is how many *lines* upon which the string appears:

echo foo foo |grep -c foo

1

You can use sed to add newlines after your input string to put each on a line by itself, to count them accurately:

grep -r foo app/ | sed -e 's/foo/&\n/g' |grep -c foo
Comment by eichin 60 weeks and 1 day ago

use

$ awk -F\: '{sum+=$2} END {print sum}'

Comment by ioggstream 60 weeks ago

Good catch eichin. Although I think using wc is still a decent approximation. Another way if you're only searching for a single word is to turn all spaces into newlines:

grep -r PATTERN app/ | tr ' ' '\n' | wc -l

although as soon as you want to search for "Micheal Jackson" this approach fails and you have use eichin's approach.

Comment by bwoodacre 60 weeks ago

I missed the -o option on my first pass through the grep manpage. Indeed -o gets what we really want:

grep -ro PATTERN . | wc -l
Comment by bwoodacre 60 weeks ago

ooh, I hadn't seen that before, nice. (As noted in the other thread, -o and -c don't play well together, but it's still a much nicer way to get non-overlapping matches, and it lets you avoid repeating the string too...)

Comment by eichin 59 weeks and 6 days ago

Your point of view

You must be signed in to comment.

Related sites and podcasts