Hide

What's this?

commandlinefu.com is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again.

Delete that bloated snippets file you've been using and share your personal repository with the world. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.


If you have a new feature suggestion or find a bug, please get in touch via http://commandlinefu.uservoice.com/

Get involved!

You can sign-in using OpenID credentials, or register a traditional username and password.

First-time OpenID users will be automatically assigned a username which can be changed after signing in.

Hide

Stay in the loop…

Follow the Tweets.

Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.

» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu3
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu10

Subscribe to the feeds.

Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):

Subscribe to the feed for:

Hide

News

2011-03-12 - Confoo 2011 presentation
Slides are available from the commandlinefu presentation at Confoo 2011: http://presentations.codeinthehole.com/confoo2011/
2011-01-04 - Moderation now required for new commands
To try and put and end to the spamming, new commands require moderation before they will appear on the site.
2010-12-27 - Apologies for not banning the trolls sooner
Have been away from the interwebs over Christmas. Will be more vigilant henceforth.
2010-09-24 - OAuth and pagination problems fixed
Apologies for the delay in getting Twitter's OAuth supported. Annoying pagination gremlin also fixed.
Hide

Tags

Hide

Functions

count how many times a string appears in a (source code) tree

Terminal - count how many times a string appears in a (source code) tree
grep -rc logged_in app/ | cut -d : -f 2 | awk '{sum+=$1} END {print sum}'
2009-07-15 14:16:44
User: terceiro
Functions: awk cut grep
-2
count how many times a string appears in a (source code) tree

grep's -c outputs how may matches there are for a given file as "file:N", cut takes the N's and awk does the sum.

Alternatives

There are 3 alternatives - vote for the best!

Terminal - Alternatives
$ grep -or string path/ | wc -l
2009-07-16 12:50:59
User: ioggstream
Functions: grep wc
9

grep -o puts each occurrence in a separate line

Know a better way?

If you can do better, submit your command here.

What others think

if you leave out the -c option of grep then you can get wc to do the counting for you:

grep -r PATTERN app/ | wc -l

because then grep returns one match per line.

Comment by bwoodacre 249 weeks ago

Strictly speaking this is how many *lines* upon which the string appears:

echo foo foo |grep -c foo

1

You can use sed to add newlines after your input string to put each on a line by itself, to count them accurately:

grep -r foo app/ | sed -e 's/foo/&\n/g' |grep -c foo
Comment by eichin 248 weeks and 6 days ago

use

$ awk -F\: '{sum+=$2} END {print sum}'

Comment by ioggstream 248 weeks and 6 days ago

Good catch eichin. Although I think using wc is still a decent approximation. Another way if you're only searching for a single word is to turn all spaces into newlines:

grep -r PATTERN app/ | tr ' ' '\n' | wc -l

although as soon as you want to search for "Micheal Jackson" this approach fails and you have use eichin's approach.

Comment by bwoodacre 248 weeks and 6 days ago

I missed the -o option on my first pass through the grep manpage. Indeed -o gets what we really want:

grep -ro PATTERN . | wc -l
Comment by bwoodacre 248 weeks and 6 days ago

ooh, I hadn't seen that before, nice. (As noted in the other thread, -o and -c don't play well together, but it's still a much nicer way to get non-overlapping matches, and it lets you avoid repeating the string too...)

Comment by eichin 248 weeks and 5 days ago

Your point of view

You must be signed in to comment.

Related sites and podcasts