commandlinefu.com is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again.
Delete that bloated snippets file you've been using and share your personal repository with the world. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.
If you have a new feature suggestion or find a bug, please get in touch via http://commandlinefu.uservoice.com/
You can sign-in using OpenID credentials, or register a traditional username and password.
First-time OpenID users will be automatically assigned a username which can be changed after signing in.
Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu3
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu10
Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):
Subscribe to the feed for:
The command `cat file >> file` failes with the following error message:
cat: file: input file is output file
`tee` is a nice workaround without using any temporary files.
There are 6 alternatives - vote for the best!
If you can do better, submit your command here.
You must be signed in to comment.
Could you please tell us at least one reason we would duplicate a file in itself ?
it looks like you mean to use > rather than >> here, because depending on when cat takes a break reading "file" and when the shell writes the incoming data you could end up with a file that just keeeeeeepppps groooooowing.
For me its nice if I need to generate a test file with a, say, 10 chunks of identical 100,000 lines in it. So it's quicker to append the file to itself 10 times than write out 100,000 lines 10 times. But (ironically) this way didn't work for me (the file kept growing), so intermediate file is not a bad alternative. Maybe it's because the file is so gigantic, but oh well...