commandlinefu.com is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again.
Delete that bloated snippets file you've been using and share your personal repository with the world. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.
If you have a new feature suggestion or find a bug, please get in touch via http://commandlinefu.uservoice.com/
You can sign-in using OpenID credentials, or register a traditional username and password.
First-time OpenID users will be automatically assigned a username which can be changed after signing in.
Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu3
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu10
Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):
Subscribe to the feed for:
Traces the system calls of a program. See http://linuxhelp.blogspot.com/2006/05/strace-very-powerful-troubleshooting.html for more information.
There are 3 alternatives - vote for the best!
This has helped me numerous times trying to find either log files or tmp files that get created after execution of a command. And really eye opening as to how active a given process really is. Play around with -anewer, -cnewer & -newerXY
If you can do better, submit your command here.
You must be signed in to comment.
Although be warned strace catches extra junk such as linker activity and process setup even before the program you desire is exec'd.
Yeah, at least use "-e file" with it, or better yet look at something like "dpkg-depcheck" which actually interprets strace output specifically with this in mind...
Advantage of the strace against t
touch /tmp/file ; $EXECUTECOMMAND ; find /path -newer /tmp/file
is that you don't have to wait for find.
Surely the strace command is different from the touch-exec-find combo? The latter will find all files changed within a time window, meaning that they could have been modified by any other process. The strace command will ONLY show files modified by the specific process. Right?
That is true, the touch-exec-find combo will find other files. But its useful for quick & dirty commands.
strace -ff |grep openwould probably suffice to truly find all files touched by a given command.
dpkg-depcheck is available in the 'devscripts' package, for those running debian/ubuntu.