Hide

What's this?

commandlinefu.com is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again.

Delete that bloated snippets file you've been using and share your personal repository with the world. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.


Get involved!

You can sign-in using OpenID credentials, or register a traditional username and password.

First-time OpenID users will be automatically assigned a username which can be changed after signing in.

Universal configuration monitoring and system of record for IT.
Hide

Stay in the loop…

Follow the Tweets.

Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.

» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu3
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu10

Subscribe to the feeds.

Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):

Subscribe to the feed for:

Hide

News

May 19, 2015 - A Look At The New Commandlinefu
I've put together a short writeup on what kind of newness you can expect from the next iteration of clfu. Check it out here.
March 2, 2015 - New Management
I'm Jon, I'll be maintaining and improving clfu. Thanks to David for building such a great resource!
Hide

Top Tags

Hide

Functions

Psst. Open beta.

Wow, didn't really expect you to read this far down. The latest iteration of the site is in open beta. It's a gentle open beta-- not in prime-time just yet. It's being hosted over at UpGuard (link) and you are more than welcome to give it a shot. Couple things:

  • » The open beta is running a copy of the database that will not carry over to the final version. Don't post anything you don't mind losing.
  • » If you wish to use your user account, you will probably need to reset your password.
Your feedback is appreciated via the form on the beta page. Thanks! -Jon & CLFU Team

Search for a <pattern> string inside all files in the current directory

Terminal - Search for a <pattern> string inside all files in the current directory
grep -r <pattern> * .[!.]*
2009-09-22 14:57:40
User: danam
Functions: grep
3
Search for a <pattern> string inside all files in the current directory

Searches all files,dirs (also hidden) recursively

Alternatives

There is 1 alternative - vote for the best!

Terminal - Alternatives
grep -RnisI <pattern> *
2009-09-22 15:09:43
User: birnam
Functions: grep
Tags: bash grep
46

This is how I typically grep. -R recurse into subdirectories, -n show line numbers of matches, -i ignore case, -s suppress "doesn't exist" and "can't read" messages, -I ignore binary files (technically, process them as having no matches, important for showing inverted results with -v)

I have grep aliased to "grep --color=auto" as well, but that's a matter of formatting not function.

find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 grep -i <pattern>
find . -type f -exec grep -i <pattern> \;
2009-09-22 14:06:11
User: levenbrech
Functions: find grep
1

shorter typing with no need to use xargs.

ack <pattern>
2009-09-22 14:08:34
User: levenbrech
1

ack seeks for , list all found files and display everything in nice colors. Look for it in http://betterthangrep.com/

grep -nisI <pattern> * .[!.]*
2013-04-18 14:33:41
User: lajarre
Functions: grep
1

options: -n line nbrs, -i ignore case, -s no "doesn't exist", -I ignore binary

args: * for all files of current dir (not hidden), .[!.]* for all hidden files

I don't include by default the -R (recursive) option, which is not always useful. You add it by hand when needed.

Know a better way?

If you can do better, submit your command here.

What others think

"-r" not available on all unices, but on most

Comment by danam 376 weeks and 4 days ago

Would just use '.' instead of "* .[!.]*"

Comment by arcege 376 weeks and 4 days ago

Your point of view

You must be signed in to comment.