commandlinefu.com is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again.
Delete that bloated snippets file you've been using and share your personal repository with the world. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.
If you have a new feature suggestion or find a bug, please get in touch via http://commandlinefu.uservoice.com/
You can sign-in using OpenID credentials, or register a traditional username and password.
First-time OpenID users will be automatically assigned a username which can be changed after signing in.
Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu3
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu10
Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):
Subscribe to the feed for:
# Small for loop, that can list files in dir, and after that executes
# [COMMAND] of your choice, usefull for example rename, move, tar etc..
# change cmd's for different results :)
There are 8 alternatives - vote for the best!
If you can do better, submit your command here.
You must be signed in to comment.
can be easier (as written) or much more powerful. Yours, as written can be accomplished as...
for FILE in *;do echo $FILE;done
Also, can be made much more selective by doing something like...
for FILE in `ls | grep -v badstufff | awk '{print $2}'|`;do [command] $FILE;done
unixmonkey1114: I actually like to do the $(ls) too, especially so I can ls in another directory.
For your second proposal, I tend to use "while" rather than "for", like :
ls | grep -v badstuff | awk '{print $2}' | while read line; do [command] $line; done
which I find clearer somehow.
Note: "while" and "for" are not equivalent in my last comment though. "for" takes spaces aswell as newlines as separator, whereas "while" only takes newlines, so it can be useful for multi-line values.
I often do:
for FILE in ...; do echo [COMMAND]; doneand then, if satisfied with the commands printed, I repeat the for command without echo