What's this?

commandlinefu.com is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again.

Delete that bloated snippets file you've been using and share your personal repository with the world. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.

If you have a new feature suggestion or find a bug, please get in touch via http://commandlinefu.uservoice.com/

Get involved!

You can sign-in using OpenID credentials, or register a traditional username and password.

First-time OpenID users will be automatically assigned a username which can be changed after signing in.

Universal configuration monitoring and system of record for IT.

Stay in the loop…

Follow the Tweets.

Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.

» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu3
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu10

Subscribe to the feeds.

Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):

Subscribe to the feed for:



2011-03-12 - Confoo 2011 presentation
Slides are available from the commandlinefu presentation at Confoo 2011: http://presentations.codeinthehole.com/confoo2011/
2011-01-04 - Moderation now required for new commands
To try and put and end to the spamming, new commands require moderation before they will appear on the site.
2010-12-27 - Apologies for not banning the trolls sooner
Have been away from the interwebs over Christmas. Will be more vigilant henceforth.
2010-09-24 - OAuth and pagination problems fixed
Apologies for the delay in getting Twitter's OAuth supported. Annoying pagination gremlin also fixed.




du with colored bar graph

Terminal - du with colored bar graph
t=$(df|awk 'NR!=1{sum+=$2}END{print sum}');sudo du / --max-depth=1|sed '$d'|sort -rn -k1 | awk -v t=$t 'OFMT="%d" {M=64; for (a=0;a<$1;a++){if (a>c){c=a}}br=a/c;b=M*br;for(x=0;x<b;x++){printf "\033[1;31m" "|" "\033[0m"}print " "$2" "(a/t*100)"% total"}'
2011-12-01 01:21:11
User: kevinquinnyo
Functions: awk du sed sort sudo
du with colored bar graph

i'm using gawk, you may get varying mileage with other varieties. You might want to change the / after du to say, /home/ or /var or something, otherwise this command might take quite some time to complete. Sorry it's so obsfucated, I had to turn a script into a one-liner under 255 characters for commandlinefu. Note: the bar ratio is relative, so the highest ratio of the total disk, "anchors" the rest of the graph. EDIT: the math was slightly wrong, fixed it. Also, made it compliant with older versions of df.


There are 3 alternatives - vote for the best!

Terminal - Alternatives

Know a better way?

If you can do better, submit your command here.

What others think

Getting this error.

du: warning: summarising conflicts with --max-depth=1

Comment by MrMuddle 173 weeks and 3 days ago

Not sure why that would happen. According to the du source code, that should only happen:

if (opt_summarize_only && max_depth_specified && max_depth != 0)

and unless you added a max-depth=0, or -s, i'm not sure why it would give you that error. I'm curios, what version of du are you running, and what OS ?

Comment by kevinquinnyo 173 weeks and 3 days ago

Ubuntu 10.10 x64

du (GNU coreutils) 8.5


Comment by MrMuddle 173 weeks and 3 days ago

what happens when you run:

sudo du / --max-depth=1|sort -rn -k1

Comment by kevinquinnyo 173 weeks and 3 days ago

Same thing bud :|

Comment by MrMuddle 173 weeks and 3 days ago

Got it right!


Comment by unixmonkey14651 173 weeks and 3 days ago

"for (a=0;ac){c=a}}" this loop is completely useless (and also responsable of the slowness of your command since a can be very large)

substitute it with a=$1; if (a>c){c=a}

Comment by BrokenDroid 172 weeks and 2 days ago

Your point of view

You must be signed in to comment.