faster version of ls *

echo *
I know its not much but is very useful in time consuming scripts (cron, rc.d, etc).
Sample Output
time ls *
real    0m1.585s
user    0m0.003s
sys     0m0.037s
time echo *
real    0m0.001s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m0.001s

By: grep
2009-02-16 21:20:13

What Others Think

On my system, it is not equivalent to "ls *" because "ls *" displays the contents of directories while "echo *" only displays there name. From what I see, "echo *" is equivalent to "ls -d * | tr '\n' ' '". That said, it's a useful trick when you only have files, although "find . -maxdepth 1" is also very fast.
raphink · 697 weeks and 5 days ago
I may have aliased my ls which might be why I thought it was equivalent
grep · 697 weeks and 5 days ago
I used to think I would meet somebody there home health care new orleans
tillyracker · 53 weeks and 5 days ago
seofox · 32 weeks and 2 days ago

What do you think?

Any thoughts on this command? Does it work on your machine? Can you do the same thing with only 14 characters?

You must be signed in to comment.

What's this? is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.

Share Your Commands

Stay in the loop…

Follow the Tweets.

Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.


Subscribe to the feeds.

Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):

Subscribe to the feed for: