Any thoughts on this command? Does it work on your machine? Can you do the same thing with only 14 characters?
You must be signed in to comment.
commandlinefu.com is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.
Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu3
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu10
Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):
Subscribe to the feed for:
cat **/*.ext > file.txt
@inof I can see why one might think that you're cat-appending to the same file multiple times because the output redirection is put before the end of the argument to the -exec option. So a more readable and error-free form of the command would be:
find . -type f -name "*.ext" -exec cat {} \; >filename.txt
so that the arguments to find and the shell syntax are clearly separated. Bash 4.0 has added support for ** globbing, although this won't obsolete find :-).