Find Duplicate Files (based on size first, then MD5 hash)

find -not -empty -type f -printf "%s\n" | sort -rn | uniq -d | xargs -I{} -n1 find -type f -size {}c -print0 | xargs -0 md5sum | sort | uniq -w32 --all-repeated=separate
This dup finder saves time by comparing size first, then md5sum, it doesn't delete anything, just lists them.

82
2009-09-21 00:24:14

10 Alternatives + Submit Alt

  • If you have the fdupes command, you'll save a lot of typing. It can do recursive searches (-r,-R) and it allows you to interactively select which of the duplicate files found you wish to keep or delete.


    24
    fdupes -r .
    Vilemirth · 2011-02-19 17:02:30 0
  • Calculates md5 sum of files. sort (required for uniq to work). uniq based on only the hash. use cut ro remove the hash from the result.


    18
    find -type f -exec md5sum '{}' ';' | sort | uniq --all-repeated=separate -w 33 | cut -c 35-
    infinull · 2009-08-04 07:05:12 0
  • Improvement of the command "Find Duplicate Files (based on size first, then MD5 hash)" when searching for duplicate files in a directory containing a subversion working copy. This way the (multiple dupicates) in the meta-information directories are ignored. Can easily be adopted for other VCS as well. For CVS i.e. change ".svn" into ".csv": find -type d -name ".csv" -prune -o -not -empty -type f -printf "%s\n" | sort -rn | uniq -d | xargs -I{} -n1 find -type d -name ".csv" -prune -o -type f -size {}c -print0 | xargs -0 md5sum | sort | uniq -w32 --all-repeated=separate Show Sample Output


    2
    find -type d -name ".svn" -prune -o -not -empty -type f -printf "%s\n" | sort -rn | uniq -d | xargs -I{} -n1 find -type d -name ".svn" -prune -o -type f -size {}c -print0 | xargs -0 md5sum | sort | uniq -w32 --all-repeated=separate
    2chg · 2010-01-28 09:45:29 0
  • This works on Mac OS X using the `md5` command instead of `md5sum`, which works similarly, but has a different output format. Note that this only prints the name of the duplicates, not the original file. This is handy because you can add `| xargs rm` to the end of the command to delete all the duplicates while leaving the original.


    2
    find . -type f -exec md5 '{}' ';' | sort | uniq -f 3 -d | sed -e "s/.*(\(.*\)).*/\1/"
    noahspurrier · 2012-01-14 08:54:12 4
  • Finds duplicates based on MD5 sum. Compares only files with the same size. Performance improvements on: find -not -empty -type f -printf "%s\n" | sort -rn | uniq -d | xargs -I{} -n1 find -type f -size {}c -print0 | xargs -0 md5sum | sort | uniq -w32 --all-repeated=separate The new version takes around 3 seconds where the old version took around 17 minutes. The bottle neck in the old command was the second find. It searches for the files with the specified file size. The new version keeps the file path and size from the beginning.


    2
    find -not -empty -type f -printf "%-30s'\t\"%h/%f\"\n" | sort -rn -t$'\t' | uniq -w30 -D | cut -f 2 -d $'\t' | xargs md5sum | sort | uniq -w32 --all-repeated=separate
    fobos3 · 2014-10-19 02:00:55 1

What Others Think

awsome, much faster then fdupes.
dakunesu · 882 weeks and 1 day ago
Isn't the -D redundant?
dennisw · 880 weeks and 5 days ago
yes it is... thanks for noticing, I fixed it.
grokskookum · 880 weeks and 5 days ago
How can you mass delete these files once they're found? (I'd like to keep one of them)
matthewbauer · 876 weeks and 4 days ago
you might want to look at fdupes or fslint in order to help with hardlinking / deleting, etc... my command is really just a quick hack to list them.
grokskookum · 876 weeks and 4 days ago
Fantastic, man. this is truly great.
oernii3 · 805 weeks and 3 days ago
"find -type" doesn?t work on Mac OS X.
ELV1S · 744 weeks and 1 day ago
can filename comparison be added as a first step to the first solution given? find -not -empty -type f -printf "%s\n" | sort -rn | uniq -d | xargs -I{} -n1 find -type f -size {}c -print0 | xargs -0 md5sum | sort | uniq -w32 --all-repeated=separate seems to me checking filename first could speed things up. if two files lack the same filename then in many cases i would not consider them a dupe. thanks
johnywhy · 736 weeks and 2 days ago
Hi, I would like if it is any way of find duplicates of a given file (not all duplicates on the fs) maybe searching directly by md5. It would be great for me.
tia · 697 weeks and 1 day ago
Does anyone know a way to find duplicate files between 2 volumes based only on size and name?
d0g · 654 weeks and 3 days ago
kos omkon 3a hal exemple
mahmoud · 636 weeks and 6 days ago
Here is the tool to find and delete duplicate files "DuplicateFilesDeleter"
ivanden · 630 weeks and 6 days ago
Should be noted that md5sum is not a collision free algorithm, so there's a probability (OK, a very small probability) that the above commands will reports files as dupes even when they're not. Should use a sha1sum if you're paranoid.
befyber · 607 weeks and 1 day ago
Just a thot: Sequence of detection 1. size 2. MAX=say 100Mb or 10 Mb (a) Full MD5 for files (b) MD5 only the first MAX bytes for files > MAX e.g. MD5 (dd if=file of=/tmp/file count=200000) 3. Full MD5 or SHA1 for files found in 2(b) --- Wud b nice for media collection. Any takers??
Atanu · 602 weeks and 1 day ago
Duplicatefilesdeleter is best removal for duplicate files
Ketan · 576 weeks ago
I use Duplicate Files Deleter as it is very effective. It is 100% accurate and performs the scan quickly.
rewanya · 553 weeks ago
Please use Duplicate files deleter, it is very simple to use. But make it sure to keep the important files in backup. Thanks everybody for giving me your valuable times.
TinaRodrigo · 521 weeks and 1 day ago
ffgg
chenlixiang · 471 weeks and 6 days ago

What do you think?

Any thoughts on this command? Does it work on your machine? Can you do the same thing with only 14 characters?

You must be signed in to comment.

What's this?

commandlinefu.com is the place to record those command-line gems that you return to again and again. That way others can gain from your CLI wisdom and you from theirs too. All commands can be commented on, discussed and voted up or down.

Share Your Commands



Stay in the loop…

Follow the Tweets.

Every new command is wrapped in a tweet and posted to Twitter. Following the stream is a great way of staying abreast of the latest commands. For the more discerning, there are Twitter accounts for commands that get a minimum of 3 and 10 votes - that way only the great commands get tweeted.

» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu3
» http://twitter.com/commandlinefu10

Subscribe to the feeds.

Use your favourite RSS aggregator to stay in touch with the latest commands. There are feeds mirroring the 3 Twitter streams as well as for virtually every other subset (users, tags, functions,…):

Subscribe to the feed for: